public inbox for util-linux@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:17:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404101117.05565.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410080514.GA26252@x2.net.home>

On Thursday 10 April 2014, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:39:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:55:57PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > The fixed interval is problematic. There are SSD devices out
> > > > > there that suffer (their flash cells die out faster) when
> > > > > they get trimmed too often. A good rule of thumb is to trim
> > > > > once you have written the same amount as you have free space
> > > > > on your device. Obviously, that interval varies for every
> > > > > user (e.g. it's one week in my case).
> > > >
> > > > Is "mount -o discard" instead of fstrim interval more or less
> > > > bad regarding lifetime?
> >
> > For those SSD's that have a problem, "mount -o discard" is a
> > disaster. Some turn into bricks, others will have a degraded flash
> > cells, many will cause extremely degraded performance for other
> > processes.
> >
> > What I usually tell people as far as who ask me for advice is that
> > once a week is usually sufficient, especially for most desktop and
> > server systems.  If you are running an extreme workload which is
> > doing a huge number of random writes, then sure, running fstrim
> > more frequently, or even using "mount -o discard" might make a lot
> > more sense --- especially if you are using PCIe attached flash. 
> > But in those cases, the system administrator might not want be
> > willing to tolerate the random latencies in performance that might
> > show up when fstrim is running (for pretty much all SATA and SAS
> > attached SSD's out there, they don't yet support queued trim, so
> > each trim command requires draining the NCQ queue, which is why
> > sending trim commands, whether via "mount -o discard" or via fstrim
> > will incur a performance penalty to whatever else might be trying
> > to use the disk at the time).
> >
> > I'll note BTW that even using "fstrim" could potentially brick an
> > especially inexpensive/trashy SSD, although the vendor for whose
> > drive had been most commonly accused of promulgating those to the
> > world is out of business (although there are probably plenty of
> > those SSD's still in use in various community distros' audiences.)
>
>  Thanks for the advices.
>
>  I have modified the systemd fstrim.timer (daily -> weekly) and added
>  some notes to the man page.

Thanks, maybe we could add another minor change to "fstrim -a" itself. 
If possible it would be IMO useful to skip bind mounts to avoid 
trimming the same filesystem several times in a row like this:

$ grep "tmp" /etc/fstab
/dev/vg0/tmpdirs     /mnt/tmpdirs   ext4       acl,user_xattr     1 2
/mnt/tmpdirs/tmp     /tmp           none       bind               0 0
/mnt/tmpdirs/var/tmp /var/tmp       none       bind               0 0

$ ./fstrim -av
/tmp: 392 KiB (401408 bytes) trimmed
/var/tmp: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
/mnt/tmpdirs: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed

Skipping bind mounts should still trim all mounted filesytems.

cu,
Rudi


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-10  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25   ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57     ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07       ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 15:42         ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12           ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09  7:52         ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07           ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02             ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12               ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 12:49                 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16                   ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24                     ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44                       ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02               ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48                 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55                   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10  8:05                       ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10  9:17                         ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-04-10 12:49                           ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 13:16                             ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22                               ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26       ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30         ` Thomas Bächler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201404101117.05565.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
    --to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox