From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:17:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404101117.05565.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410080514.GA26252@x2.net.home>
On Thursday 10 April 2014, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:39:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:55:57PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > The fixed interval is problematic. There are SSD devices out
> > > > > there that suffer (their flash cells die out faster) when
> > > > > they get trimmed too often. A good rule of thumb is to trim
> > > > > once you have written the same amount as you have free space
> > > > > on your device. Obviously, that interval varies for every
> > > > > user (e.g. it's one week in my case).
> > > >
> > > > Is "mount -o discard" instead of fstrim interval more or less
> > > > bad regarding lifetime?
> >
> > For those SSD's that have a problem, "mount -o discard" is a
> > disaster. Some turn into bricks, others will have a degraded flash
> > cells, many will cause extremely degraded performance for other
> > processes.
> >
> > What I usually tell people as far as who ask me for advice is that
> > once a week is usually sufficient, especially for most desktop and
> > server systems. If you are running an extreme workload which is
> > doing a huge number of random writes, then sure, running fstrim
> > more frequently, or even using "mount -o discard" might make a lot
> > more sense --- especially if you are using PCIe attached flash.
> > But in those cases, the system administrator might not want be
> > willing to tolerate the random latencies in performance that might
> > show up when fstrim is running (for pretty much all SATA and SAS
> > attached SSD's out there, they don't yet support queued trim, so
> > each trim command requires draining the NCQ queue, which is why
> > sending trim commands, whether via "mount -o discard" or via fstrim
> > will incur a performance penalty to whatever else might be trying
> > to use the disk at the time).
> >
> > I'll note BTW that even using "fstrim" could potentially brick an
> > especially inexpensive/trashy SSD, although the vendor for whose
> > drive had been most commonly accused of promulgating those to the
> > world is out of business (although there are probably plenty of
> > those SSD's still in use in various community distros' audiences.)
>
> Thanks for the advices.
>
> I have modified the systemd fstrim.timer (daily -> weekly) and added
> some notes to the man page.
Thanks, maybe we could add another minor change to "fstrim -a" itself.
If possible it would be IMO useful to skip bind mounts to avoid
trimming the same filesystem several times in a row like this:
$ grep "tmp" /etc/fstab
/dev/vg0/tmpdirs /mnt/tmpdirs ext4 acl,user_xattr 1 2
/mnt/tmpdirs/tmp /tmp none bind 0 0
/mnt/tmpdirs/var/tmp /var/tmp none bind 0 0
$ ./fstrim -av
/tmp: 392 KiB (401408 bytes) trimmed
/var/tmp: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
/mnt/tmpdirs: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
Skipping bind mounts should still trim all mounted filesytems.
cu,
Rudi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 15:42 ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 7:52 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 12:49 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10 8:05 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 9:17 ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 13:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30 ` Thomas Bächler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201404101117.05565.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox