From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410124914.GB26252@x2.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201404101117.05565.sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:17:04AM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> Thanks, maybe we could add another minor change to "fstrim -a" itself.
> If possible it would be IMO useful to skip bind mounts to avoid
> trimming the same filesystem several times in a row like this:
>
> $ grep "tmp" /etc/fstab
> /dev/vg0/tmpdirs /mnt/tmpdirs ext4 acl,user_xattr 1 2
> /mnt/tmpdirs/tmp /tmp none bind 0 0
> /mnt/tmpdirs/var/tmp /var/tmp none bind 0 0
>
> $ ./fstrim -av
> /tmp: 392 KiB (401408 bytes) trimmed
> /var/tmp: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
> /mnt/tmpdirs: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
>
> Skipping bind mounts should still trim all mounted filesytems.
Good idea point, but what about systems where the original
mountpoint is umounted?
/dev/sda1 /foo ext4 default
/foo /bar none bind
# mount /foo
# mount /bar
# umount /foo
the another story is that we use /proc/self/mountinfo where is
nothing about "bind". It would be probably better to de-duplicate the
list of the filesystems according to filesystem UUID or so.
I'll think about it.
Note all this is probably no problema for ext4 where according to Lukas is
optimization to not call device trim command when there is nothing to trim.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 15:42 ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 7:52 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 12:49 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10 8:05 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 9:17 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2014-04-10 13:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30 ` Thomas Bächler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140410124914.GB26252@x2.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox