public inbox for util-linux@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>, util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:12:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404091412.34060.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409110251.GT22126@x2.net.home>

On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:07:56PM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> > Actually I think daily "fstrim -a" IS not a good idea for most of
> > my systems
>
> install service != enable (this is important detail, I'll never agree
> with automatically enabled services).

> BTW, why IS not a good idea for your systems?

Because I don't need it. 

> > but I feel no need to discuss this here on util-linux because
> > the decision whether, how, when and on which devices fstrim should
> > be called should not be made here at all.
>
> well, "fstrim -a" contains heruistic to select the right filestems
> (it really does not call trim for all devices), it has been
> implemented to *avoid* sysadmins creativity. If you don't like it,
> you can use "fstrim <device>" (for example from crontab).

I'd like the documentation more detailed.
Does it really run on all mounts or only /etc/fstab?
Does it write on automounted devices which are probably not owned by the 
admin? Does it affect read-only mounts?

> > If we add scripts with one generic use case for fstrim. Why don't
> > we add the generic boot and maintenance scripts how and when to
> > mount or fsck all filesystems, to activate swap, to get and set
> > hwclock or whatever?
>
> I really don't want to follow this insane direction of the
> discussion.
>
> > Moreover the portability issue. Why adding scripts for systemd only
> > allthough the same could be done without systemd in a more portable
> > way.
>
> is there any other unified, distribution independent and distribution
> supported way to install, but no enable the stuff?

This fstrim.timer IS NOT unified and distribution independent.

IMO the task itself is already installed since we have fstrim's 
option -a". You just need to _enable_ it to run whenever you want for 
example by using crontab. That's trivial.

Nobody would have thought about adding a 1-liner cronjob file to 
util-linux eventhough any distro has /etc/cron.daily/. But now systemd 
timer? Thats what I don't understand.

Ah ... and the "not-enabled" cronjob could have been installed somewhere 
in /usr/share/ or /etc/sysconfig to be linked from /etc/cron.daily/. 
And ... this cronjob would be even more comfortable because you could 
link it from  cron.daily/ cron.hourly/ cron.monthly/ cron.weekly/
without need to copy and edit like such systemd.timer.

If _creating_ a systemd timer is too complicated for today's admins then 
systemd upstream could add a command like
  systemd-create-timer --daily --exec "fstrim -a"
to create and enable it.

cu,
Rudi

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25   ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57     ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07       ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 15:42         ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12           ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09  7:52         ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07           ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02             ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12               ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-04-09 12:49                 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16                   ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24                     ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44                       ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02               ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48                 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55                   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10  8:05                       ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10  9:17                         ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 12:49                           ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 13:16                             ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22                               ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26       ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30         ` Thomas Bächler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201404091412.34060.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
    --to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@archlinux.org \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox