From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>, util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:12:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404091412.34060.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409110251.GT22126@x2.net.home>
On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:07:56PM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote:
> > Actually I think daily "fstrim -a" IS not a good idea for most of
> > my systems
>
> install service != enable (this is important detail, I'll never agree
> with automatically enabled services).
> BTW, why IS not a good idea for your systems?
Because I don't need it.
> > but I feel no need to discuss this here on util-linux because
> > the decision whether, how, when and on which devices fstrim should
> > be called should not be made here at all.
>
> well, "fstrim -a" contains heruistic to select the right filestems
> (it really does not call trim for all devices), it has been
> implemented to *avoid* sysadmins creativity. If you don't like it,
> you can use "fstrim <device>" (for example from crontab).
I'd like the documentation more detailed.
Does it really run on all mounts or only /etc/fstab?
Does it write on automounted devices which are probably not owned by the
admin? Does it affect read-only mounts?
> > If we add scripts with one generic use case for fstrim. Why don't
> > we add the generic boot and maintenance scripts how and when to
> > mount or fsck all filesystems, to activate swap, to get and set
> > hwclock or whatever?
>
> I really don't want to follow this insane direction of the
> discussion.
>
> > Moreover the portability issue. Why adding scripts for systemd only
> > allthough the same could be done without systemd in a more portable
> > way.
>
> is there any other unified, distribution independent and distribution
> supported way to install, but no enable the stuff?
This fstrim.timer IS NOT unified and distribution independent.
IMO the task itself is already installed since we have fstrim's
option -a". You just need to _enable_ it to run whenever you want for
example by using crontab. That's trivial.
Nobody would have thought about adding a 1-liner cronjob file to
util-linux eventhough any distro has /etc/cron.daily/. But now systemd
timer? Thats what I don't understand.
Ah ... and the "not-enabled" cronjob could have been installed somewhere
in /usr/share/ or /etc/sysconfig to be linked from /etc/cron.daily/.
And ... this cronjob would be even more comfortable because you could
link it from cron.daily/ cron.hourly/ cron.monthly/ cron.weekly/
without need to copy and edit like such systemd.timer.
If _creating_ a systemd timer is too complicated for today's admins then
systemd upstream could add a command like
systemd-create-timer --daily --exec "fstrim -a"
to create and enable it.
cu,
Rudi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 15:42 ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 7:52 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12 ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-04-09 12:49 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10 8:05 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 9:17 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 13:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30 ` Thomas Bächler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201404091412.34060.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox