From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane()
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:08:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107220843.GM2237@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181101150605.18235-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:06:01PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We're going to need access to the new crtc state in ->disable_plane()
> for SKL+ wm/ddb programming and pre-skl pipe gamma/csc control. Pass
> the crtc state down.
>
> We'll also try to make intel_crtc_disable_planes() drtr as much as
> it's possible. The fact that we don't have a separate crtc state
> for the disabled state when we're going to re-enable the crtc later
> means we might end up poking at a few extra planes in there. But
> that's harmless. I suppose one migth argue that we wouldn't have to
> care about proper ddb/wm/csc/gamma if the pipe is going to permanently
> disable anyway, but the state checker probably cares so we should try
> our best to make sure everything is programmed correctly even in that
> case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 39 ++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h | 8 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 12 ++++---
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 010269a12390..69fc7010190c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *old_state,
> } else {
> trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
>
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
> }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 33d73915b73e..6088ae554e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2781,7 +2781,7 @@ static void intel_plane_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(&crtc->base);
>
> trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc_state);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -3386,7 +3386,7 @@ static void i9xx_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i9xx_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = plane->i9xx_plane;
> @@ -5421,23 +5421,32 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
> }
>
> -static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_crtc *crtc, unsigned plane_mask)
> +static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> + unsigned int update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
> + const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state;
> struct intel_plane *plane;
> unsigned fb_bits = 0;
> + int i;
>
> intel_crtc_dpms_overlay_disable(crtc);
>
> - for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> - if (plane_mask & BIT(plane->id)) {
> - plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> + for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, i) {
why getting "i" if it is unused later?
do you have plans to reuse this for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state somewhere else?
Besides the "i" I'm not sure I liked it returning multiple things.
if we are not going to use in more places I'd prefer something more verbose
here than macromagics.
> + if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
> + !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
> + continue;
> +
> + plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
>
> + if (old_plane_state->base.visible)
> fb_bits |= plane->frontbuffer_bit;
> - }
> }
>
> - intel_frontbuffer_flip(to_i915(dev), fb_bits);
> + intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev_priv, fb_bits);
> }
>
> static void intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -9855,9 +9864,9 @@ static void i845_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i845_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - i845_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> + i845_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> }
>
> static bool i845_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -10084,9 +10093,9 @@ static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void i9xx_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - i9xx_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> + i9xx_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> }
>
> static bool i9xx_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -12840,7 +12849,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> intel_pre_plane_update(old_intel_crtc_state, new_intel_crtc_state);
>
> if (old_crtc_state->active) {
> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_crtc, old_intel_crtc_state->active_planes);
> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_state, intel_crtc);
>
> /*
> * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
> @@ -13695,7 +13704,7 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> to_intel_plane_state(plane->state));
> } else {
> trace_intel_disable_plane(plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> - intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> + intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, crtc_state);
> }
>
> intel_plane_unpin_fb(to_intel_plane_state(old_plane_state));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> index 5d50decbcbb5..df9e6ebb27de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> @@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
> for_each_power_well_rev(__dev_priv, __power_well) \
> for_each_if((__power_well)->desc->domains & (__domain_mask))
>
> +#define for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, old_plane_state, __i) \
> + for ((__i) = 0; \
> + (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> + ((plane) = to_intel_plane((__state)->base.planes[__i].ptr), \
> + (old_plane_state) = to_intel_plane_state((__state)->base.planes[__i].old_state), 1); \
> + (__i)++) \
> + for_each_if(plane)
> +
> #define for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, new_plane_state, __i) \
> for ((__i) = 0; \
> (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 7a55f5921d34..facd5cb0b540 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ struct intel_plane {
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> void (*disable_plane)(struct intel_plane *plane,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> bool (*get_hw_state)(struct intel_plane *plane, enum pipe *pipe);
> int (*check_plane)(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index 84c5f532fba5..2f97a298c24e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ icl_update_slave(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;
> @@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ vlv_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> @@ -918,7 +920,8 @@ ivb_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> @@ -1084,7 +1087,8 @@ g4x_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> }
>
> static void
> -g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> --
> 2.18.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-01 15:05 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Nuke posting reads from plane update/disable funcs Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 18:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-09 17:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Remove the PS_PWR_GATE write from skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Polish the skl+ plane keyval/msk/max register setup Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:41 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:55 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 20:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl+ PLANE_POS vs. scaler handling Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-08 19:30 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-08 19:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-07 21:26 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 21:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Move single buffered plane register writes to the end Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 22:06 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Generalize skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:22 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-11-08 11:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:52 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fix latency==0 handling for level 0 watermark on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09 0:01 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:43 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:11 ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Move ddb/wm programming into plane update/disable hooks on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-09 1:38 ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Commit skl+ planes in an order that avoids ddb overlaps Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-01 18:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-07 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev6) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107220843.GM2237@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox