Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane()
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:32:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181109143249.GI9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181108235202.GH27871@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:52:02PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:06:01PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > We're going to need access to the new crtc state in ->disable_plane()
> > for SKL+ wm/ddb programming and pre-skl pipe gamma/csc control. Pass
> > the crtc state down.
> > 
> > We'll also try to make intel_crtc_disable_planes() drtr as much as
> 
> What does "drtr" stand for?

Should have been "dtrt" as in "do the right thing".

> 
> The main behavioral change I see in that function is that we don't do
> frontbuffer tracking for nv12 slave planes anymore (and in the future
> won't do it for other planes that weren't visible, but you still want to
> reprogram them in some way).

So intel_post_plane_update() calls
frontbuffer_flip(pipe_config->fb_bits), pipe_config->fb_bits is
populated by intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() based on the
old+new plane visibility, hence new slave planes won't be set in
that bitmask, unless they were previosuly used as non-slave
planes. So I think that does agree with my new code pretty well.

However, thinking a bit more what the frontbuffer tracking is trying
to achieve, maybe we should always include every visible plane that
is being reprogrammed. Eg. if we have to reprogram plane 1A on account
of a ddb change the resulting flip does cause an fbc nuke, which
could be used by the frontbuffer tracking to re-enable fbc if it
had been previosuly invalidated. But this probably needs more thought
so should be done later (if ever).

> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> > it's possible. The fact that we don't have a separate crtc state
> > for the disabled state when we're going to re-enable the crtc later
> > means we might end up poking at a few extra planes in there. But
> > that's harmless. I suppose one migth argue that we wouldn't have to
> > care about proper ddb/wm/csc/gamma if the pipe is going to permanently
> > disable anyway, but the state checker probably cares so we should try
> > our best to make sure everything is programmed correctly even in that
> > case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c      | 39 ++++++++++++++---------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h      |  8 +++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h          |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c       | 12 ++++---
> >  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > index 010269a12390..69fc7010190c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *old_state,
> >  		} else {
> >  			trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
> >  
> > -			plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> > +			plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 33d73915b73e..6088ae554e56 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -2781,7 +2781,7 @@ static void intel_plane_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >  		intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(&crtc->base);
> >  
> >  	trace_intel_disable_plane(&plane->base, crtc);
> > -	plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> > +	plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc_state);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > @@ -3386,7 +3386,7 @@ static void i9xx_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void i9xx_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > -			       struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +			       const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> >  	enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = plane->i9xx_plane;
> > @@ -5421,23 +5421,32 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> >  		intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_crtc *crtc, unsigned plane_mask)
> > +static void intel_crtc_disable_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > +				      struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >  {
> > -	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > +	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> > +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > +	unsigned int update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
> > +	const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state;
> >  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> >  	unsigned fb_bits = 0;
> > +	int i;
> >  
> >  	intel_crtc_dpms_overlay_disable(crtc);
> >  
> > -	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> > -		if (plane_mask & BIT(plane->id)) {
> > -			plane->disable_plane(plane, crtc);
> > +	for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, i) {
> > +		if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
> > +		    !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		plane->disable_plane(plane, new_crtc_state);
> >  
> > +		if (old_plane_state->base.visible)
> >  			fb_bits |= plane->frontbuffer_bit;
> > -		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	intel_frontbuffer_flip(to_i915(dev), fb_bits);
> > +	intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev_priv, fb_bits);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > @@ -9855,9 +9864,9 @@ static void i845_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void i845_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > -				struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +				const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > -	i845_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> > +	i845_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool i845_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > @@ -10084,9 +10093,9 @@ static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void i9xx_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > -				struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +				const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > -	i9xx_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> > +	i9xx_update_cursor(plane, crtc_state, NULL);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool i9xx_cursor_get_hw_state(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > @@ -12840,7 +12849,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> >  		intel_pre_plane_update(old_intel_crtc_state, new_intel_crtc_state);
> >  
> >  		if (old_crtc_state->active) {
> > -			intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_crtc, old_intel_crtc_state->active_planes);
> > +			intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_state, intel_crtc);
> >  
> >  			/*
> >  			 * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
> > @@ -13695,7 +13704,7 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> >  					  to_intel_plane_state(plane->state));
> >  	} else {
> >  		trace_intel_disable_plane(plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> > -		intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
> > +		intel_plane->disable_plane(intel_plane, crtc_state);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	intel_plane_unpin_fb(to_intel_plane_state(old_plane_state));
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > index 5d50decbcbb5..df9e6ebb27de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > @@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
> >  	for_each_power_well_rev(__dev_priv, __power_well)		        \
> >  		for_each_if((__power_well)->desc->domains & (__domain_mask))
> >  
> > +#define for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, old_plane_state, __i) \
> > +	for ((__i) = 0; \
> > +	     (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > +		     ((plane) = to_intel_plane((__state)->base.planes[__i].ptr), \
> > +		      (old_plane_state) = to_intel_plane_state((__state)->base.planes[__i].old_state), 1); \
> > +	     (__i)++) \
> > +		for_each_if(plane)
> > +
> >  #define for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane, new_plane_state, __i) \
> >  	for ((__i) = 0; \
> >  	     (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 7a55f5921d34..facd5cb0b540 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ struct intel_plane {
> >  			     const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >  			     const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> >  	void (*disable_plane)(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > -			      struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> > +			      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >  	bool (*get_hw_state)(struct intel_plane *plane, enum pipe *pipe);
> >  	int (*check_plane)(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >  			   struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > index 84c5f532fba5..2f97a298c24e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> > @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ icl_update_slave(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > -skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +skl_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > +		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> >  	enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;
> > @@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ vlv_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > -vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +vlv_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > +		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> >  	enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> > @@ -918,7 +920,8 @@ ivb_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > -ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +ivb_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > +		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> >  	enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> > @@ -1084,7 +1087,8 @@ g4x_update_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > -g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +g4x_disable_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > +		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> >  	enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> > -- 
> > 2.18.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
> Intel Corporation
> (916) 356-2795

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-09 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 15:05 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Nuke posting reads from plane update/disable funcs Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:17   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:13     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 18:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-09 17:24         ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Remove the PS_PWR_GATE write from skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Polish the skl+ plane keyval/msk/max register setup Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:41   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:55   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 20:56     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl+ PLANE_POS vs. scaler handling Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:42   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-08 19:30     ` Matt Roper
2018-11-08 19:48       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-07 21:26   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 21:38     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Move single buffered plane register writes to the end Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:26   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 22:06   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Generalize skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:49   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:32     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:22   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:57     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:43     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:52   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:32     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fix latency==0 handling for level 0 watermark on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09  0:01   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:34     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:43   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:11   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:46     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Move ddb/wm programming into plane update/disable hooks on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:44   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-09  1:38     ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:53       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Commit skl+ planes in an order that avoids ddb overlaps Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-01 18:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-07 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev6) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181109143249.GI9144@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox