Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:32:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108113202.GR9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107214939.GL2237@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 01:49:39PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Keep track which planes need updating during the commit. For now this
> > is just (was_visible || is_visible) but I'll have need to update
> > invisible planes later on for skl plane ddbs and for pre-skl pipe
> > gamma/csc control (which lives in the primary plane control register).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c       | 1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 8 ++++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c      | 5 ++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h          | 3 +++
> >  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
> > index a5a2c8fe58a7..8cb02f28d30c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
> > @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ intel_crtc_duplicate_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >  	crtc_state->fifo_changed = false;
> >  	crtc_state->wm.need_postvbl_update = false;
> >  	crtc_state->fb_bits = 0;
> > +	crtc_state->update_planes = 0;
> >  
> >  	return &crtc_state->base;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > index 7d3685075201..010269a12390 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
> >  	if (state->visible && state->fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12)
> >  		crtc_state->nv12_planes |= BIT(intel_plane->id);
> >  
> > +	if (state->visible || old_plane_state->base.visible)
> > +		crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(intel_plane->id);
> > +
> >  	return intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(old_crtc_state,
> >  					       &crtc_state->base,
> >  					       old_plane_state,
> > @@ -171,14 +174,11 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *old_state,
> >  				 struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> >  				 struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> >  {
> > +	u32 update_mask = new_crtc_state->update_planes;
> >  	struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state;
> >  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> > -	u32 update_mask;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	update_mask = old_crtc_state->active_planes;
> > -	update_mask |= new_crtc_state->active_planes;
> > -
> 
> maybe this useless update_mask removal deserved a separated patch,
> but not a big deal...

It's still there, just populated differently.

> 
> >  	for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(old_state, plane, new_plane_state, i) {
> >  		if (crtc->pipe != plane->pipe ||
> >  		    !(update_mask & BIT(plane->id)))
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 852b5897e80b..33d73915b73e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -10797,8 +10797,10 @@ static int icl_check_nv12_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		plane_state->linked_plane = NULL;
> > -		if (plane_state->slave && !plane_state->base.visible)
> > +		if (plane_state->slave && !plane_state->base.visible) {
> >  			crtc_state->active_planes &= ~BIT(plane->id);
> > +			crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(plane->id);
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		plane_state->slave = false;
> >  	}
> > @@ -10839,6 +10841,7 @@ static int icl_check_nv12_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  		linked_state->slave = true;
> >  		linked_state->linked_plane = plane;
> >  		crtc_state->active_planes |= BIT(linked->id);
> > +		crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(linked->id);
> >  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using %s as Y plane for %s\n", linked->base.name, plane->base.name);
> >  	}
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 5331bbed5e8c..7a55f5921d34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -925,6 +925,9 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> >  	u8 active_planes;
> >  	u8 nv12_planes;
> >  
> > +	/* bitmask of planes that will be updated during the commit */
> 
> I noticed how bad we are with documentation compared to the rest of drm
> structs :/
> 
> but I'm glad you added the explanation in the comment here.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> 
> > +	u8 update_planes;
> > +
> >  	/* HDMI scrambling status */
> >  	bool hdmi_scrambling;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.18.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 15:05 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Nuke posting reads from plane update/disable funcs Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:17   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:13     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 18:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-09 17:24         ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Remove the PS_PWR_GATE write from skl_program_scaler() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Polish the skl+ plane keyval/msk/max register setup Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:41   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:55   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 20:56     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Clean up skl+ PLANE_POS vs. scaler handling Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 19:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Reorganize plane register writes to make them more atomic Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:42   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-08 19:30     ` Matt Roper
2018-11-08 19:48       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-07 21:26   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-07 21:38     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Move single buffered plane register writes to the end Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:26   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 22:06   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Generalize skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Introduce crtc_state->update_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 21:49   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:32     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-11-08 23:22   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 13:57     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Pass the new crtc_state to ->disable_plane() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:43     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-08 23:52   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:32     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fix latency==0 handling for level 0 watermark on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-09  0:01   ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:34     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Remove some useless zeroing on skl+ wm calculations Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:43   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 22:11   ` [PATCH " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-08 11:46     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Move ddb/wm programming into plane update/disable hooks on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2018-11-07 18:44   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-09  1:38     ` Matt Roper
2018-11-09 14:53       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-01 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Commit skl+ planes in an order that avoids ddb overlaps Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 15:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-01 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-01 18:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-11-07 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Program SKL+ watermarks/ddb more carefully (rev6) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181108113202.GR9144@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox