Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>,
	"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luis Rodriguez" <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
	"tomasw@gmail.com" <tomasw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: Re-enable aggregation
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:05:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e72e890810200205s58b4bfcbk8d2e75f68dc0ca84@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224493469.18024.38.camel@johannes.berg>

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 02:01 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> > Well the fact that it's in tx_h_sequence is a bit weird, but we should
>> > be able to get around not using an extra bit in skb I think. Especially
>> > for this since it's only really between the driver and mac80211, and
>> > after a requeue the ampdu status might actually change.
>>
>> Good point. I failed to see that. So in that case it should be as
>> sujith had it before my suggestion and just handle it as he had it in
>> the tx handlers. The problem though is that the RC algorithm should be
>> the one to determine if an skb is part of an ampdu for aggregation or
>> not IMHO. Actually this is the real question and hot topic.
>>
>> When should we aggregate and should mac80211 decide that or be left to the RC.
>
> No, the RC algorithm cannot decided that, the RC algorithm can merely
> decide when to set up/tear down aggregation sessions. When a session is
> up all packet belonging to that TID should go into it, surely?

Good question :)

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-20  8:22 [RFC] mac80211: Re-enable aggregation Sujith
2008-10-20  8:31 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  8:35   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20  8:45     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  8:47       ` Sujith
2008-10-20  8:55         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20  8:57           ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  9:01             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20  9:04               ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  9:05                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-10-20  9:11                 ` Sujith
2008-10-20  8:57       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20  8:58   ` Sujith
2008-10-20  9:12     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  9:31       ` Sujith
2008-10-20  9:38         ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20 10:35           ` Sujith
2008-10-20 12:22             ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20 18:03               ` Sujith
2008-10-20 21:46                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-21  6:46                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-21  7:18                   ` Sujith
2008-10-22 10:03                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-22 11:59                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-22 17:22                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-23  8:57                         ` Sujith
2008-10-23 14:46                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 14:25                             ` Sujith
2008-10-27 15:04                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-27 15:56                                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-27 16:04                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-28 14:24                                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-22 10:00                 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-22 11:41                   ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-22 17:24                     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-23  9:31                   ` Sujith
2008-10-23 14:45                     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-23 17:23                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-23 18:31                         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-23 20:18                           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-23 21:17                             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-31  1:26                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-27 14:11                       ` Sujith
2008-10-27 15:07                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20  9:14     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-10-20  9:24       ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-20 10:07         ` Sujith
2008-10-20 10:15           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43e72e890810200205s58b4bfcbk8d2e75f68dc0ca84@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox